HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/5/814    most recent 0363546505281805v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steinberg, N. Articles by Siev-Ner, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Steinberg, N. Articles by Siev-Ner, I. Related Collections Female Athletes Other

Range of Joint Movement in Female Dancers and Nondancers Aged 8 to 16 Years

Anatomical and Clinical Implications

Nili Steinberg, MSc^*,,, Israel Hershkovitz, PhD, Smadar Peleg, MSc, Gali Dar, MSc, Youssef Masharawi, PhD, Michael Heim, MD^|| and Itzhak Siev-Ner, MD^||,¶

From the Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel, Zinman College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel, Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel, the ^|| Orthopedic Rehabilitation Department, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel, and ^¶ Israel Performing Arts Medicine Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

^* Address correspondence to Nili Steinberg, Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 69978, Israel. (e-mail: knopp{at}wincol.ac.il).

Background: Little data are available on changes that occur with age in joint range of motion in dancers and nondancers.

Hypothesis: In dancers, joint range of motion will increase with age, whereas it will decrease in nondancers, independent of the joint studied.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: The study population included 1320 female dancers, aged 8 to 16 years, who participated in different types of dancing classes (classical ballet, modern dance, jazz, etc) and 226 nondancers of similar age. Range of motion was measured for the hip, knee, ankle, foot, and spinal joints.

Results: The pattern of differences in range of motion with age varied in different joints and types of movement. (1) For combined ankle and foot plantar flexion (pointe), ankle plantar flexion, and hip external rotation, there was no change in range of motion in dancers, whereas range of motion diminished with age in the nondancers. (2) For ankle dorsiflexion, neither group showed any change with age, and range of motion was significantly greater in the nondancer group. (3) For knee flexion, hip flexion, and hip internal rotation, range of motion decreased with age in both groups. (4) For hip abduction, range of motion decreased with age in dancers and remained constant in the nondancers. (5) For hip extension, range of motion increased in both groups. (6) For lower back and hamstrings, range of motion increased among dancers with age and remained constant among nondancers.

Conclusion: Dancers and teachers should realize that passive joint range of motion is unlikely to improve with age. Therefore, the major goal of a dancing program should focus on exercises that retain the natural flexibility of the dancers’ joints rather than trying to improve them.

Key Words: dancers • range of motion (ROM) • age • joints