|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
* Address correspondence to Keith L. Markolf, PhD, Biomechanics Research Section, University of California at Los Angeles Rehabilitation Center, Room 21-67, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6902 (e-mail: kmarkolf{at}mednet.ucla.edu).
Background: Objective results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are often less than satisfactory, with many patients exhibiting excessive posterior laxity.
Hypothesis: Changes in the position of the femoral tunnel within the posterior cruciate ligaments femoral footprint will significantly affect anteroposterior laxities and graft forces.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: The posterior cruciate ligaments femoral origin was mechanically isolated in 13 fresh-frozen knee specimens, and the bone cap containing the ligaments insertion was attached to a load cell that recorded resultant force during tibial loading tests. Anteroposterior laxity (at +mn; 200 N applied force) was also measured. Cast acrylic replicas of the bone cap were fabricated, with tunnels placed in anterolateral, central, and posteromedial regions of the footprint. A graft reconstruction was tested in each tunnel.
Results: Mean laxities with the anterolateral tunnel were +0.9 mm to +1.7 mm greater than normal between 0° and 45° of flexion. Mean laxities with the posteromedial tunnel were 2.4 mm to 3.7 mm less than normal between 10° and 45° of flexion. Mean laxities with the central tunnel were not significantly different from intact knee values, except at 0° (0.9 mm greater). Mean graft forces with the anterolateral tunnel were normal for most modes of loading, whereas there were significant increases in graft forces with the posteromedial and central tunnels.
Conclusion: The anterolateral tunnel reproduced normal posterior cruciate ligament force profiles but produced a knee that was more lax than normal between 0° and 45° of flexion. The central tunnel best matched intact knee laxities, but graft forces were higher than posterior cruciate ligament forces between 0° and 45° of flexion. The posteromedial tunnel overconstrained anteroposterior laxity approximately 2 to 4 mm between 0° and 45° of flexion and generated higher graft forces in the same flexion range.
Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a posteromedial tunnel should not be used for single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Key Words: posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) knee ligament biomechanics PCL reconstruction PCL graft forces
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Markolf, B. R. Graves, S. M. Sigward, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister How Well Do Anatomical Reconstructions of the Posterolateral Corner Restore Varus Stability to the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee? Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |