HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/12/2006    most recent 0363546506290403v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Papannagari, R. Articles by Li, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Papannagari, R. Articles by Li, G. Related Collections Reconstruction Kinematics and kinetics

In Vivo Kinematics of the Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

A Clinical and Functional Evaluation

From the Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

^* Address correspondence to Guoan Li, PhD, Director, Bioengineering Lab, MGH/Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, GRJ 1215, Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: gli1{at}partners.org).

Background: Recent follow-up studies have reported a high incidence of joint degeneration in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Abnormal kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have been thought to contribute to the degeneration.

Hypothesis: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which was designed to restore anterior knee laxity under anterior tibial loads, does not reproduce knee kinematics under in vivo physiological loading conditions.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Both knees of 7 patients with complete unilateral rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament were magnetic resonance imaged, and 3D models were constructed from these images. The anterior cruciate ligament of the injured knee was arthroscopically reconstructed using a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. Three months after surgery, the kinematics of the intact contralateral and reconstructed knees were measured using a dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic system while the subjects performed a single-legged weightbearing lunge. The anterior laxity of both knees was measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer.

Results: The anterior laxity of the reconstructed knee as measured with the arthrometer was similar to that of the intact contralateral knee. However, under weightbearing conditions, there was a statistically significant increase in anterior translation of the reconstructed knee compared with the intact knee at full extension (approximately 2.9 mm) and 15° (approximately 2.2 mm) of flexion. In addition, there was a mean increase in external tibial rotation of the anterior cruciate ligament–reconstructed knee beyond 30° of flexion (approximately 2° at 30° of flexion), although no statistical significance was detected.

Conclusion: The data demonstrate that although anterior laxity was restored during KT-1000 arthrometer testing, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction did not restore normal knee kinematics under weightbearing loading conditions.

Clinical Relevance: Future reconstruction techniques should aim to restore function of the knee under physiological loading conditions.

Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction • in vivo kinematics • KT-1000 • anterior laxity • clinical stability

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. C. Stanford, D. Kendoff, R. F. Warren, and A. D. Pearle Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament Obliquity Versus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Obliquity: An Observational Study Using Navigated Measurements Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2009; 37(1): 114 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kozanek, S. K. Van de Velde, T. J. Gill, and G. Li The Contralateral Knee Joint in Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2151 - 2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Brophy, J. E. Voos, F. J. Shannon, C. C. Granchi, T. L. Wickiewicz, R. F. Warren, and A. D. Pearle Changes in the Length of Virtual Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibers During Stability Testing: A Comparison of Conventional Single-Bundle Reconstruction and Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2196 - 2203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Van de Velde, T. J. Gill, L. E. DeFrate, R. Papannagari, and G. Li The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency and Reconstruction on the Patellofemoral Joint Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1150 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Lohmander, P. M. Englund, L. L. Dahl, and E. M. Roos The Long-term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries: Osteoarthritis Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1756 - 1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Jordan, L. E. DeFrate, K. W. Nha, R. Papannagari, T. J. Gill, and G. Li The In Vivo Kinematics of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament During Weightbearing Knee Flexion Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 547 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]