| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
|
|
|||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, Nashville, Tennessee, the University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital, Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, the || American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Rosemont, Illinois, and ¶ Data Harbor Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois
* Address correspondence to Allen F. Anderson, MD, Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, 4230 Harding Road, 10th Floor, Nashville, TN 37205 (e-mail: andersonaf{at}tnortho.com).
Background: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form may be used to measure symptoms, function, and sports activity for people with a variety of knee disorders, including ligamentous and meniscal injuries, osteoarthritis, and patellofemoral dysfunction. To date, normative data have not been established for this valid, reliable, and responsive outcomes instrument.
Purpose: To provide clinicians and researchers with normative data to facilitate the interpretation of results on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form.
Study Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Methods: The Subjective Knee Evaluation Form was mailed to 600 people in each of 8 age/gender categories (18–24 years, 25–34 years, 35–50 years, and 51–65 years for both male subjects and female subjects). Participants were drawn from a panel of 550 000 households (1 300 000 subjects) representative of noninstitutionalized persons in the United States and were matched to data from the United States Census Bureau on geographical region, market size, income, and household size.
Results: Complete data were available for 5246 knees. Twenty-eight percent of respondents reported an injury, weakness, or other problem with one or both knees. Normative data were determined for respondents as a whole and for the subset of respondents with no history of knee problems. Mean scores were determined for men aged 18 to 24 years (89 ± 18), 25 to 34 years (89 ± 16), 35 to 50 years (85 ± 19), and 51 to 55 years (77 ± 23); mean scores were also determined for women aged 18 to 24 years (86 ± 19), 25 to 34 years (86 ± 19), 35 to 50 years (80 ± 23), and 51 to 65 years (71 ± 26). Scores were higher for the subset of respondents with no history of current or prior knee problems.
Conclusion: Scores on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form vary by age, gender, and history of knee problems. The normative data collected in this article will allow clinicians to interpret how patients with knee injuries are functioning relative to their age- and gender-matched peers and will enable researchers to determine the clinical outcomes of treatment.
Key Words: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) • normative data • knee outcomes instrument
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. W. Wright Knee Injury Outcomes Measures J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2009; 17(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Saupe, L. M. White, M. M. Chiavaras, J. Essue, I. Weller, M. Kunz, M. Hurtig, and P. Marks Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Grafts: MR Imaging Features at Long-term Follow-up--Correlation with Functional and Clinical Evaluation Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 581 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Hambly and K. Griva IKDC or KOOS? Which Measures Symptoms and Disabilities Most Important to Postoperative Articular Cartilage Repair Patients? Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1695 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Lebel, C. Hulet, B. Galaud, G. Burdin, B. Locker, and C. Vielpeau Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1275 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. H. Fu, W. Shen, J. S. Starman, N. Okeke, and J. J. Irrgang Primary Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Preliminary 2-Year Prospective Study Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1263 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. P. Slobogean, K. Mulpuri, and C. W. Reilly The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Evaluation Form in a Preadolescent Population: Pilot Normative Data Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 129 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Tanner, K. N. Dainty, R. G. Marx, and A. Kirkley Knee-Specific Quality-of-Life Instruments: Which Ones Measure Symptoms and Disabilities Most Important to Patients? Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1450 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. M. Mehta, L. W. Paxton, S. X. Fornalski, R. P. Csintalan, and D. C. Fithian Reliability of the International Knee Documentation Committee Radiographic Grading System Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2007; 35(6): 933 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. D. Shelbourne and J. F. Dickens Digital Radiographic Evaluation of Medial Joint Space Narrowing After Partial Meniscectomy of Bucket-Handle Medial Meniscus Tears in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Intact Knees Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2006; 34(10): 1648 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
