AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on November 10, 2005, doi:10.1177/0363546505281236
This version was published on January 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/1/116    most recent
0363546505281236v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koh, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lautenschlager, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koh, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lautenschlager, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal studies
Right arrow Biomechanics
Right arrow Graft fixation
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 34:116-119 (2006)
© 2006 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Effect of Angled Osteochondral Grafting on Contact Pressure

A Biomechanical Study

Jason Lee Koh, MD*,{dagger}, Adam Kowalski{ddagger} and Eugene Lautenschlager, PhD{dagger}

From the {dagger} Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, and {ddagger} Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

* Address correspondence to Jason Lee Koh, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, 645 North. Michigan Avenue, Suite 910, Chicago, IL 60611 (e-mail: kohj1{at}hotmail.com).

Background: Flush osteochondral plugs can reduce contact pressure compared with an empty defect in the articular cartilage. However, incongruities such as graft angulation have an unknown effect.

Hypothesis: Incongruity of the articular cartilage after osteochondral transplantation affects articular surface contact pressure.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: An 80-N load was applied with a material testing system for 120 seconds to the femoral condyles of 50 fresh swine knees. Contact pressures were measured using Prescale super low film. Five conditions were tested: (1) intact articular surface; (2) surface with 4.5-mm-diameter circular defect; (3) defect grafted with a flush 4.5-mm-diameter plug from the contralateral condyle; (4) defect grafted with a 30° angled 4.5-mm-diameter plug, with lower edge flush (tip elevated with respect to the adjacent surface); and (5) defect grafted with a 30° plug, with tip flush to the adjacent surface (lower edge sunk). Angled grafts were obtained using a rotational bearing vise aligned with a 30° fixed-angle track. The film was digitally scanned and analyzed, and standard statistical tests were performed.

Results: Mean peak pressures of intact cartilage (8.57 kg/cm2), flush graft (9.81 kg/cm2), and sunk and angled graft (9.15 kg/cm2) were not significantly different (P < .5). The mean pressures for defects (12.01 kg/cm2) and the elevated angled graft (14.50 kg/cm2) were significantly (P < .05) higher than that of intact cartilage.

Clinical Relevance: Slightly sunk grafts were still able to reduce elevated contact pressures to normal levels. However, elevated angled grafts increased contact pressure. These results suggest that it is preferable to leave an edge slightly sunk rather than elevated.

Key Words: osteochondral transplant • contact pressure • biomechanics • cartilage transplant




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. Treme, J. A. Hart, and M. D. Miller
What's New in Sports Medicine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 686 - 696.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.