|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||

,

,
From * Rocky Mountain Orthopaedic Associates, Grand Junction, Colorado, the
San Diego Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Fellowship at University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, and the
Orthopedic Biomechanics Research Center, Childrens Hospital, San Diego, California
Address correspondence to Robert Pedowitz, MD, PhD, 350 Dickinson Street (8894), San Diego, CA 92103-8894 (e-mail: rpedowitz{at}ucsd.edu).
Background: Surgeons can control not only the angle but also the depth of suture anchor placement during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, although the tendency may be to place suture anchors on the deep side to avoid damage from prominent anchor eyelets. However, little information is available regarding possible effects of suture anchor depth on construct failure mechanisms.
Hypothesis: Anchor depth affects the mode of suture failure with physiologically relevant cyclic loads.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Metallic screw-in suture anchors loaded with No. 2 braided polyester sutures were inserted into the bovine infra-spinatus footprint with the eyelet proud, standard, or deep. Sutures were hand tied to create a closed loop. Constructs were cyclically loaded from 10 to 90 N and, if still intact at 500 cycles, taken to ultimate failure (maximum load).
Results: When clinical failure was defined as greater than 3-mm construct elongation, anchors placed with the eyelet deep experienced statistically earlier clinical failure via cutting of the suture through the bone (P < .02). However, anchors placed at this level did not experience catastrophic failure during cyclic loading. The standard and proud anchors experienced 3 mm of elongation at a greater number of cycles, but the suture material degraded at the anchor eyelet, and a majority of these constructs broke during cyclic physiologic loading. At failure testing, the deep anchors had a significantly increased failure load (164 N) compared to standard (133 N) (P < .04) and proud (113 N) anchors (P < .005).
Conclusion: Varying the depth of suture anchor insertion changes the mechanical properties and mode of failure of suture anchor constructs.
Clinical Relevance: Surgeons should be aware of the effects of suture anchor depth and abrasive eyelet wear on construct failure during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Key Words: rotator cuff repair suture anchors insertion depth biomechanics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Zheng, H. W. Harris, and J. R. Andrews Failure Analysis of Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparison of Three Double-Row Techniques J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2008; 90(5): 1034 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. McFarland, H. B. Park, E. Keyurapan, H. S. Gill, and H. S. Selhi Suture Anchors and Tacks for Shoulder Surgery, Part 1: Biology and Biomechanics Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1918 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |