|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Nashville Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Center, Nashville, Tennessee
* Address correspondence to J. W. Thomas Byrd, MD, Nashville Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Center, 2011 Church Street, Suite 100, Nashville, TN 37203 (e-mail: info{at}nsmoc.com).
Background: Hip arthroscopy has defined elusive causes of hip pain.
Hypothesis/Purpose: It is postulated that the reliability of various investigative methods is inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these methods.
Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
Methods: Five parameters were assessed in 40 patients: clinical assessment, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium arthrography, intra-articular bupivacaine injection, and arthroscopy. Using arthroscopy as the definitive diagnosis, the other parameters were evaluated for reliability.
Results: Hip abnormality was clinically suspected in all cases with 98% accuracy (1 false positive). However, the nature of the abnormality was identified in only 13 cases with 92% accuracy. Magnetic resonance imaging variously demonstrated direct or indirect evidence of abnormality but overall demonstrated a 42% false-negative and a 10% false-positive interpretation. Magnetic resonance arthrography demonstrated an 8% false-negative and 20% false-positive interpretation. Response to the intra-articular injection of anesthetic was 90% accurate (3 false-negative and 1 false-positive responses) for detecting the presence of intra-articular abnormality.
Conclusions: In this series, clinical assessment accurately determined the existence of intra-articular abnormality but was poor at defining its nature. Magnetic resonance arthrography was much more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging at detecting various lesions but had twice as many false-positive interpretations. Response to an intra-articular injection of anesthetic was a 90% reliable indicator of intra-articular abnormality.
Key Words: hip arthroscopy evaluation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) magnetic resonance arthrography hip pathology
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Studler, F. Kalberer, M. Leunig, M. Zanetti, J. Hodler, C. Dora, and C. W. A. Pfirrmann MR Arthrography of the Hip: Differentiation between an Anterior Sublabral Recess as a Normal Variant and a Labral Tear Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 947 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Anderson and J. S. Keene Results of Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Tendon Release in Competitive and Recreational Athletes Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2363 - 2371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Shindle, J. E. Voos, S. J. Nho, B. E. Heyworth, and B. T. Kelly Arthroscopic Management of Labral Tears in the Hip J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_4): 2 - 19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Shindle, J. E. Voos, B. E. Heyworth, D. N. Mintz, L. E. Moya, R. L. Buly, and B. T. Kelly Hip Arthroscopy in the Athletic Patient: Current Techniques and Spectrum of Disease J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(suppl_3): 29 - 43. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Flanum, J. S. Keene, D. G. Blankenbaker, and A. A. DeSmet Arthroscopic Treatment of the Painful "Internal" Snapping Hip: Results of a New Endoscopic Technique and Imaging Protocol Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 770 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. J. Burnett, G. J. D. Rocca, H. Prather, M. Curry, W. J. Maloney, and J. C. Clohisy Clinical Presentation of Patients with Tears of the Acetabular Labrum J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2006; 88(7): 1448 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |