|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


From the * Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, and the
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shin-Suma Hospital, Kobe, Japan
Address correspondence to Shinichi Yoshiya, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.
Background: It is generally thought that tissue regeneration and good functional recovery can be expected after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the hamstring tendons. However, persistent strength deficit in deep knee flexion has also been reported.
Hypothesis: Morphologic regeneration of the harvested hamstring tendon is not necessarily associated with its functional recovery.
Study Design: Retrospective follow-up study.
Method: Twenty-eight patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring graft were evaluated after a minimum period of 2 years. Status of tendon regrowth was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. To specifically analyze the functional deficit after graft harvest, the isometric hamstring strength was examined in a sitting position at 90° of flexion and a prone position at 90° and 110° of flexion. Then, the strength data were correlated with the extent of tendon regeneration.
Results: In 22 of the 28 patients, a regrowth of the semitendinosus tendon was found, whereas regeneration of the gracilis tendon was observed in 13 patients. In the evaluation of hamstring strength, the isometric peak torque was reduced to 86.2%, 54.6%, and 49.1%, respectively, in the aforementioned 3 postures as compared with the contralateral side.
Conclusions: Significant functional deficit of hamstring strength remains regardless of morphologic regeneration.
Key Words: knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction muscle strength tendon regeneration
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. C. Prodromos, F. H. Fu, S. M. Howell, D. H. Johnson, and K. Lawhorn Controversies in Soft-tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Grafts, Bundles, Tunnels, Fixation, and Harvest J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2008; 16(7): 376 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takeda, S. Kashiwaguchi, T. Matsuura, T. Higashida, and A. Minato Hamstring Muscle Function After Tendon Harvest for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation With T2 Relaxation Time of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Matsumoto, S. Yoshiya, H. Muratsu, M. Yagi, Y. Iwasaki, M. Kurosaka, and R. Kuroda A Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Bone-Hamstring Tendon-Bone Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |