AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on March 11, 2004, doi:10.1177/0095399703258751
This version was published on April 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/727    most recent
0095399703258751v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiRaimondo, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lintner, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DiRaimondo, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lintner, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Shoulder
Right arrow Operative
Right arrow Biomechanics
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32:727-733 (2004)
© 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

A Biomechanical Comparison of Repair Techniques for Type II SLAP Lesions

Carl A. DiRaimondo, MD, Jerry W. Alexander, Philip C. Noble, PhD, Walter R. Lowe, MD and David M. Lintner, MD*

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Sports Medicine Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

* Address correspondence to David M. Lintner, M.D., 6550 Fannin, Suite 400, Houston, TX 77030.

Background: Multiple options exist for repair of superior labral tears.

Purpose: To compare commonly used fixation techniques for superior labral tears.

Study Design: Biomechanical cadaveric study.

Methods: A comparison of the initial strengths of fixation for type II superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions was performed in three cadaveric shoulder groups, each containing seven specimens. Two groups were repaired with screw-in anchors; one group had vertical sutures, the other horizontal. Group 3 was repaired using bioabsorbable tacks. Cyclic traction was applied to the biceps tendon. Repair failure (2 mm of permanent displacement) and ultimate failure were measured.

Results: Specimen stiffness was similar between groups. The mean load to repair failure was 123 ± 17 N in group 1, 114 ± 11 N in group 2, and 95 ± 13 N in group 3. The mean load to ultimate failure was 163 ± 15 N, 161 ± 12 N, and 145 ± 12 N, respectively. Although the repair failure loads of groups 1 and 2 were 29% and 17%, respectively, greater than the tack group, the differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). All ultimate failures occurred at the labral-implant interface.

Conclusion: Initial fixation strength of tissue tack and suture anchor repairs of SLAP lesions are comparable.

Key Words: labral repair • SLAP • tissue tacks • suture anchors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. G. McFarland, H. B. Park, E. Keyurapan, H. S. Gill, and H. S. Selhi
Suture Anchors and Tacks for Shoulder Surgery, Part 1: Biology and Biomechanics
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1918 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.