AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on March 11, 2004, doi:10.1177/0363546503261735
This version was published on April 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/666    most recent
0363546503261735v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jani, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Matava, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jani, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Matava, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Meniscus
Right arrow Animal studies
Right arrow Biomechanics
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32:666-674 (2004)
© 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Mechanical Properties of Bioabsorbable Meniscal Arrows as a Function of Tear Location

An Ex Vivo Experimental Study

Mihir M. Jani, MD, Matthew J. Silva, PhD, Ron V. Gregush, MD and Matthew J. Matava, MD*

From Washington University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri

* Address correspondence to Matthew J. Matava, MD, Washington University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, St Louis, MO 63110 (e-mail: matavam{at}msnotes.wustl.edu).

Background: Ex vivo studies have established that arrow fixation of meniscal tears is inferior to vertical sutures and is dependent on arrow length, although the influence of tear location is not known.

Hypothesis: Arrow length and tear location influence the mechanical properties of meniscal arrows.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: A longitudinal incision was created either 2 mm or 7 mm from the periphery in 70 bovine medial menisci. Each was repaired with a meniscal arrow (10, 13, or 16 mm) or a single vertical suture and subjected to load-to-failure testing and video-graphic analysis.

Results: Mode of failure (P < .0001), maximum force (P < .0001), stiffness (P < .01), 2-mm gap force (P < .03), and ultimate gap formation (P < .002) were all directly related to arrow length. Sixteen-mm arrows and suture exhibited similar, superior mechanical properties. Tear location significantly influenced properties of 10-mm and 16-mm but not 13-mm arrows. Ten-millimeter arrows displayed the worst performance.

Conclusions: Mechanical properties of meniscal arrows depend on tear location and arrow length.

Clinical Relevance: Sixteen-millimeter arrows are a possible alternative to suture for repair of central tears. Thirteen-millimeter arrows may be effective for central and peripheral tears. Ten-millimeter arrows should not be used.

Key Words: meniscus • repair • arrows • biomechanics






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.