|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||


From the * Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, and the
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Address correspondence to Edward G. McFarland, MD, 10753 Falls Road, Suite 215, Lutherville, MD 21093 (e-mail: emcfarl{at}jhmi.edu).
Purpose: Chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions are a common source of pain and disability in the shoulder. The goal of this study was to evaluate diagnostic values of physical tests for isolated, chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.
Study Design: A retrospective case-control study.
Methods: Between 1994 and 2002, 35 patients underwent a distal clavicle excision for isolated acromioclavicular joint lesions. The results of 3 commonly used examinations for acromioclavicular joint lesions were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy.
Results: The cross body adduction stress test showed the greatest sensitivity (77%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (72%) and active compression test (41%). The active compression test had the greatest specificity (95%). All tests had a negative predictive value of greater than 94%, but the positive predictive value was less than 30% for all tests. The active compression test had the highest overall accuracy (92%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (84%) and the cross arm adduction stress test (79%). Combinations of the tests increased the diagnostic values for chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.
Conclusions: These tests have utility in evaluating patients with acromioclavicular joint pathologic lesions, and a combination of these physical tests is more helpful than isolated tests.
Key Words: acromioclavicular joint examination arthritis osteolysis resection
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E J Hegedus, A Goode, S Campbell, A Morin, M Tamaddoni, C T Moorman III, and C Cook Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2008; 42(2): 80 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Mazzocca, R. A. Arciero, and J. Bicos Evaluation and Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 316 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. McFarland, H. S. Selhi, and E. Keyurapan Clinical Evaluation of Impingement: What To Do and What Works J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 432 - 441. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yelland A positive result on both the Paxinos test and bone scan ruled in a diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint pain Evid. Based Med., February 1, 2005; 10(1): 27 - 27. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |