|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||




From the
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
Department of Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
* Address correspondence to Chih-Hwa Chen, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kweishan, 333, Taiwan (e-mail: afachen{at}doctor.com).
Background: Various autografts or allografts have been used for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft is considered a good graft choice.
Hypothesis: Quadriceps tendon-patellar bone graft for PCL reconstruction can achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome after 3 years postoperatively.
Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
Methods: From 1996, the graft has been used in 32 patients. Twenty-nine patients with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up were analyzed.
Results: Twenty-four (83%) patients achieved good or excellent results by Lysholm knee rating. Sixteen (55%) patients could return to moderate or strenuous activity. Twenty-five (86%) patients had ligament laxity of less than 5 mm. Twenty-four (83%) patients were rated as normal or nearly normal by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) guidelines. Twenty-four (83%) and 26 (90%) patients could achieve recovery of extensor and flexor muscle strength to 80% or more of normal knee, respectively. A statistically significant difference exists in thigh girth difference, extensor strength, and flexor strength before and after reconstruction.
Conclusion: Our study revealed satisfactory clinical subjective and objective results at a minimum 3 years follow-up. Quadriceps tendon autograft has the advantage of being self-available, a relatively easier arthroscopic technique, and having a suitable size, making it an acceptable graft choice for PCL reconstruction.
Key Words: posterior cruciate ligament arthroscopy quadriceps tendon graft autograft
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. F. M. Jackson, W. M. van der Tempel, L. J. Salmon, H. A. Williams, and L. A. Pinczewski Endoscopically-assisted single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: RESULTS AT MINIMUM TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP J Bone Joint Surg Br, October 1, 2008; 90-B(10): 1328 - 1333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Ahn, J. H. Wang, S. H. Lee, J. C. Yoo, and W. J. Jeon Increasing the Distance Between the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and the Popliteal Neurovascular Bundle by a Limited Posterior Capsular Release During Arthroscopic Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Angiographic Study Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 787 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Markolf, B. T. Feeley, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister Biomechanical Studies of Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1788 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Noyes and S. Barber-Westin Posterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement with a Two-Strand Quadriceps Tendon-Patellar Bone Autograft and a Tibial Inlay Technique J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2005; 87(6): 1241 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin Posterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction, Part 2: Results of Revision Using a 2-Strand Quadriceps Tendon-Patellar Bone Autograft Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2005; 33(5): 655 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |