|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
,*



From the Departments of
Orthopaedics and
Diagnostic Radiology, Norra Älvsborg County Hospital, and
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Trollhättan and Göteborg, Sweden.
* Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jüri Kartus, Department of Orthopaedics, NU-Hospital, SE-461 85 Trollhättan, Sweden.
Background: The central third of the patellar tendon is the most frequently used autograft for ACL reconstruction.
Hypothesis: The patellar tendon at the donor site would look normal as seen on MRI 6 years after harvesting its central third.
Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients were included in the study. MRI examinations of the donor site were performed at 6 (5 to 10) weeks, 6 (6 to 8) months, 27 (24 to 29) months, and 71 (68 to 73) months postoperatively. The contralateral normal side was examined only on the first occasion.
Results: The size of the donor-site gap decreased significantly (P = 0.0001) between 6 weeks and 6 years. In most patients, a thinning of the central part of the patellar tendon was still found at 6 years. The thickness of the peripheral patellar tendon was increased, compared with the contralateral healthy side, until 2 years (P = 0.003). On all occasions, the width was increased compared with the contralateral side (P < 0.015).
Conclusion: Prospective MRI examinations revealed that the patellar tendon at the donor site had not normalized 6 years after harvesting its central third. The reharvesting of the patellar tendon can therefore not be recommended.
Key Words: anterior cruciate surgery patellar tendon magnetic resonance imaging prospective study
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. L. Busam, M. T. Provencher, and B. R. Bach Jr Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Constructs: Care and Prevention Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 379 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Montgomery and M. D. Miller What's New in Sports Medicine J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 686 - 694. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |