|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
,




* Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey
Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Shriners Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Marsha Grant-Ford, ATC, PhD, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Avenue, Upper Montclair, NJ 07043
Background: Wrist pain from repetitive dorsiflexion and compression during pommel horse exercises is common among male gymnasts.
Purpose: To determine the biomechanical effects of a prophylactic wrist brace on the wrist and ulnocarpal joints during mechanical loading in a cadaveric model.
Hypothesis: The lateral wedge of the palmar pad of the brace will compensate for positive ulnar variance, distributing contact forces more evenly across the radioulnar carpal joint.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Six male and six female fixed cadaveric forearm-wrist specimens were subjected to a 32.13-kg compressive load applied through the long axis of the pronated forearm with a dorsiflexed wrist in contact with a support surface. Wrist joint dorsiflexion angle and ulnocarpal joint intraarticular peak pressure were assessed under three brace conditions: Ezy ProBrace with and without palmar pad and a nonbraced control.
Results: Wrist joint dorsiflexion angle was significantly reduced by the Ezy ProBrace with and without the palmar pad. However, ulnocarpal joint intraarticular peak pressure was reduced only by the brace with pad.
Conclusion: Prevention of pathologic wrist changes requires intervention in pressure attenuation, which was achieved with the Ezy ProBrace with palmar pad.
Clinical Relevance: This brace may decrease the cumulative effects of repetitive stress of pommel horse exercise training.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. DiFiori, D. J. Caine, and R. M. Malina Wrist Pain, Distal Radial Physeal Injury, and Ulnar Variance in the Young Gymnast Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 840 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |