AJSM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Steadman, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Steadman, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Reconstruction
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 30:479-482 (2002)
© 2002 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Reliability of Heel-Height Measurement for Documenting Knee Extension Deficits

Theodore F. Schlegel, MD{dagger},{ddagger}, Martin Boublik, MD{dagger}, Richard J. Hawkins, MD{dagger},§ and J. Richard Steadman, MD{dagger},§

{dagger} Steadman Hawkins Denver Clinics, Denver and Vail, Colorado
§ Steadman Hawkins Sports Medicine Foundation, Vail, Colorado

Presented at the 21st annual meeting of the AOSSM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 1995.

{ddagger} Address correspondence and reprint requests to Theodore F. Schlegel, MD, Steadman Hawkins Denver Clinic, 8200 East Belleview, Suite 615, Englewood, CO 80111

Background: Heel-height difference has been used to detect subtle knee flexion contractures, but the effects of thigh circumference differences and patient positioning during testing have not been evaluated.

Hypothesis: Differences in thigh circumference measurements and whether the patient’s patellae are on or off the examination table during heel-height difference measurement will not affect the accuracy of detecting knee flexion contracture.

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.

Methods: Bilateral knee range of motion, prone heel-height difference with the patellae on and off the table, and thigh circumference at 5 and 15 cm proximal to the proximal pole of the patella were measured by one investigator on 50 consecutive patients who had undergone unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Results: A high degree of correlation was demonstrated between the heel-height difference and the standard range of motion measurement. Differences in thigh girth and patellar position did not statistically affect the accuracy of the heel-height difference as an indicator of knee flexion contracture.

Conclusion: Heel-height difference is a valid method of documenting knee flexion contractures. Compared with traditional goniometer assessment, this test is a more meaningful and easier way for detecting subtle knee flexion contractures of less than 10°.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. Magit, A. Wolff, K. Sutton, and M. J. Medvecky
Arthrofibrosis of the Knee
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2007; 15(11): 682 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. E. Webster, J. J. Chiu, and J. A. Feller
Impact of Measurement Error in the Analysis of Bone Tunnel Enlargement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1680 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.