AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ebramzadeh, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ebramzadeh, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Operative
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 30:432-436 (2002)
© 2002 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Surgical Repair of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures

A Biomechanical Comparison of Two Techniques

David S. Pereira, MD{dagger},{ddagger}, Ronald S. Kvitne, MD{dagger}, Michael Liang§, Frank B. Giacobetti, MD{dagger} and Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD§

{dagger} Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, California
§ Orthopedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California

Presented at the interim meeting of the AOSSM, Orlando, Florida, March 2000.

{ddagger} Address correspondence and reprint requests to David S. Pereira, MD, 1245 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10128

Background: Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon has most commonly been repaired by anatomic reattachment of the tendon to the radial tuberosity by a single- or two-incision approach. Researchers have studied suture anchor attachment through a single incision, but the tendon-suture interface and bone quality have not previously been analyzed.

Hypothesis: Suture anchor repair results in stiffness and tensile strength equal to that of bone-tunnel repair for biceps tendon rupture.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Twelve matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were used. Suture anchor and bone-tunnel tendon repairs were performed in a randomized fashion. Each specimen was loaded to tensile failure. Load-displacement graphs were generated to calculate repair stiffness, yield strength, and ultimate strength. Computed tomography bone density measurements and additional statistical analyses were then performed after grouping the specimens by mode of failure.

Results: The bone-tunnel repair was found to be significantly stiffer in all cases and to have significantly greater tensile strength than the suture anchor repair in the younger, nonosteoporotic elbows.

Conclusions: Suture anchor repairs were not as stiff or strong as bone-tunnel repairs.

Clinical Relevance: Biceps tendon surgery using the traditional two-incision technique yields a stronger and stiffer repair in the typical patient with this injury.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
P. R. Chavan, T. R. Duquin, and L. J. Bisson
Repair of the Ruptured Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1618 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Kettler, M. J. Tingart, J. Lunger, and V. Kuhn
Reattachment of the distal tendon of biceps: FACTORS AFFECTING THE FAILURE STRENGTH OF THE REPAIR
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2008; 90-B(1): 103 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. J. Bisson, J. G. de Perio, A. E. Weber, M. T. Ehrensberger, and C. Buyea
Is It Safe to Perform Aggressive Rehabilitation After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using the Modified 2-Incision Approach?: A Biomechanical Study
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2045 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Kettler, J. Lunger, V. Kuhn, W. Mutschler, and M. J. Tingart
Failure Strengths in Distal Biceps Tendon Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1544 - 1548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. D. Mazzocca, K. J. Burton, A. A. Romeo, S. Santangelo, D. A. Adams, and R. A. Arciero
Biomechanical Evaluation of 4 Techniques of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 252 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. S. Idler, W. H. Montgomery III, D. P. Lindsey, P. A. Badua, G. F. Wynne, and S. A. Yerby
Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison of Intact Tendon and 2 Repair Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 968 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. E. Lemos, E. Ebramzedeh, and R. S. Kvitne
A New Technique: In Vitro Suture Anchor Fixation Has Superior Yield Strength to Bone Tunnel Fixation for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2004; 32(2): 406 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. M. Gartsman and S. S. Hasan
What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 171 - 181.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.