HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hutchinson, M. R. Articles by Bae, T. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hutchinson, M. R. Articles by Bae, T. S. Related Collections Reconstruction Anatomy

Reproducibility of Anatomic Tibial Landmarks for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

Sportsmedicine and Human Performance Center, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

* Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mark R. Hutchinson, MD, 209 Medical Sciences South, M/C 844, 901 South Wolcott, Chicago, IL 60612

We evaluated the reproducibility of landmarks used for accurate anatomic placement of the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Landmarks evaluated were the medial tibial eminence, the posterior cruciate ligament, the "over-the-back" position, the true posterior border of the tibia, and the posterior border of the lateral meniscus. Forty-two pairs of cadaveric knees were dissected, and anatomic measurements were made regarding the anterior cruciate ligament insertion and these various landmarks. Statistical analysis was used to confirm reproducibility and significance. Measurements based on the medial tibial eminence and posterior border of the meniscus were particularly erratic. The most reproducible anatomic landmark was the posterior cruciate ligament. The anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament was consistently 6.7 mm posterior to the posterior border of the anterior cruciate ligament and 10.9 mm posterior to the central sagittal insertion point of the anterior cruciate ligament. The over-the-back position was consistently in contact with the anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament if the knee was flexed with a posterior-directed force applied. In this position, the over-the-back position was equally reproducible as compared with the posterior cruciate ligament. Measurements gauged from the true posterior border of the tibia gave a second rigid bony landmark but with a wider standard deviation than the posterior cruciate ligament-based landmarks. The relative anterior-posterior dimension of the tibia did not correlate with the relationship between the anterior cruciate ligament and other anatomic landmarks.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Purnell, A. I. Larson, and W. Clancy Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insertions on the Tibia and Femur and Their Relationships to Critical Bony Landmarks Using High-Resolution Volume-Rendering Computed Tomography Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2083 - 2090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Mauch, G. Apic, U. Becker, and G. Bauer Differences in the Placement of the Tibial Tunnel During Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament With and Without Computer-Assisted Navigation Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1824 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Howell and K. W. Lawhorn Gravity Reduces the Tibia When Using a Tibial Guide That Targets the Intercondylar Roof Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1702 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]