|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
* Address correspondence and reprint requests to Eiichi Tsuda, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan
Seventy-five patients underwent unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft at our institution. The graft was harvested using a two-transverse-incision technique, and patellar and tibial bony defects were repaired with cored bone grafts collected by reaming the femoral socket and the tibial socket or tunnel. We evaluated the incidence of anterior knee pain, donor site tenderness, and sensory disturbance after use of these procedures. We also analyzed the correlation between anterior knee pain and age, sex, bone plug length, range of motion, postoperative stability, patellar tendon shortening, infrapatellar nerve injury, and the size of the patellar defect. Thirteen patients reported anterior knee pain. Donor site tenderness was detected in 10 patients and was located on the inferior pole of the patella, the tibial tubercle, or both. Sensory disturbance was found over the infrapatellar nerve area in 13 patients. Statistical analysis showed that anterior instability (side-to-side difference of >3 mm) and residual patellar bony defect (depth >2 mm) were risk factors for anterior knee pain. The results of our study suggest that cored cancellous bone grafting for complete restoration of the donor site bony defects and the two-transverse-incision technique to preserve the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve contribute to prevention of anterior knee symptoms.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Ishibashi, E. Tsuda, A. Fukuda, H. Tsukada, and S. Toh Intraoperative Biomechanical Evaluation of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Navigation System: Comparison of Hamstring Tendon and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2008; 36(10): 1903 - 1912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J Biau, C. Tournoux, S. Katsahian, P. J Schranz, and R. S Nizard Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis BMJ, April 29, 2006; 332(7548): 995 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Mastrokalos, J. Springer, R. Siebold, and H. H. Paessler Donor Site Morbidity and Return to the Preinjury Activity Level After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Ipsilateral and Contralateral Patellar Tendon Autograft: A Retrospective, Nonrandomized Study Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2005; 33(1): 85 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Otsuka, Y. Ishibashi, E. Tsuda, K. Sasaki, and S. Toh Comparison of Three Techniques of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft: Differences in Anterior Tibial Translation and Tunnel Enlargement with Each Technique Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2003; 31(2): 282 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |