HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boon, A. J. Articles by Amrami, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boon, A. J. Articles by Amrami, K. M. Related Collections Biomechanics Ankle Fracture Skiing/snowboarding

Snowboarder’s Talus Fracture

Mechanism of Injury

Andrea J. Boon, MD^*,, Jay Smith, MD^*, Mark E. Zobitz, MS and Kimberly M. Amrami, MD

^* Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rochester, Minnesota
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Rochester, Minnesota
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrea J. Boon, MD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Fracture of the lateral process of the talus is an injury unique to snowboarders and is of particular clinical relevance because it masquerades as an anterolateral ankle sprain and is difficult to detect on standard radiographic views. Misdiagnosis can lead to long-term morbidity in a young and active population, with ensuing severe degeneration of the subtalar joint. To date, the precise mechanism of injury has not been established, making it difficult to identify potential preventive strategies in equipment design or snowboarding technique. Fracture of the lateral process of the talus in snowboarders has been thought to result from pure dorsiflexion and inversion combined with axial loading. We hypothesized, however, that external rotation is a key component of the mechanism of injury. Ten cadaveric ankles were mounted on a materials testing machine in a position of fixed dorsiflexion and inversion. All ankles were loaded to failure axially, with or without combined external rotation. No fractures occurred after axial loading in dorsiflexion and inversion, but six of eight specimens sustained fractures of the lateral process of the talus when similarly loaded with external rotation added, supporting our hypothesis. Further study is needed to evaluate the relationship between various types of snowboarding equipment and fracture mechanism.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Berkowitz and D. H. Kim Process and Tubercle Fractures of the Hindfoot J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., December 1, 2005; 13(8): 492 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Valderrabano, T. Perren, C. Ryf, P. Rillmann, and B. Hintermann Snowboarder's Talus Fracture: Treatment Outcome of 20 Cases After 3.5 Years Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2005; 33(6): 871 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Mizel, P. J. Hecht, J. V. Marymont, and H. T. Temple Evaluation and Treatment of Chronic Ankle Pain J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 622 - 632. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Funk, S. C. M. Srinivasan, and J. R. Crandall Snowboarder's Talus Fractures Experimentally Produced by Eversion and Dorsiflexion Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2003; 31(6): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]