|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||


* Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
Department of Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Bruce D. Beynnon, PhD, University of Vermont, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, McClure Musculoskeletal Research Center, Robert T. Stafford Hall, Burlington, VT 05405
The relationship between the elongation values of an autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft immediately after fixation and the anterior-posterior laxity of the knee 5 years later was studied in vivo. Immediately after fixation, the change in the graft midsubstance length during passive knee flexion-extension was measured using a Hall-effect transducer, and anterior-posterior knee laxity was measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Subjects were divided into group 1 (N = 6), with graft elongation values bounded by the 95% confidence intervals of the normal anterior cruciate ligament elongation values, and group 2 (N = 7), subjects with values outside these intervals. Immediately after reconstruction, the side-to-side difference in anterior-posterior laxity between the reconstructed and uninjured knees was not different between group 1 (-2.6 ± 0.7 mm, mean ± SEM) and group 2 (-1.7 ± 1.0 mm) (P = 0.49). At 5-year follow-up, the difference was 1.2 ± 0.7 mm for group 1, while for group 2 it was significantly greater at 4.7 ± 0.6 mm (P = 0.004). At surgery, graft elongation values produced by flexion of the knee that are outside the limits of the anterior cruciate ligament result in significant increases in anterior knee laxity at long-term follow-up, while grafts with elongation values similar to the normal anterior cruciate ligament do not. Not only is restoration of anterior-posterior laxity values to within normal limits important, but the biomechanical behavior of the graft produced by flexion-extension of the knee should be appreciated.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. J. Ciccone II, D. R. Bratton, D. M. Weinstein, and J. J. Elias Viscoelasticity and Temperature Variations Decrease Tension and Stiffness of Hamstring Tendon Grafts Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2006; 88(5): 1071 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, J. A. Abate, B. C. Fleming, and C. E. Nichols Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Part 2 Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1751 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, J. A. Abate, B. C. Fleming, and C. E. Nichols Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Part I Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1579 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Musahl, A. Plakseychuk, A. VanScyoc, T. Sasaki, R. E. Debski, P. J. McMahon, and F. H. Fu Varying Femoral Tunnels Between the Anatomical Footprint and Isometric Positions: Effect on Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2005; 33(5): 712 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |