|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||



* Department of Sports Health Care, Arizona School of Health Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona
the Shoulder Kinematics Research Laboratory, Division of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
|| Mid-Valley Orthopaedic Clinic, Albany, Oregon
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Eric L. Sauers, PhD, ATC, Department of Sports Health Care, Arizona School of Health Sciences, 3210 West Camelback Road, Phoenix, AZ 85017
The purpose of this study was to objectively characterize in vivo glenohumeral joint laxity using an instrumented shoulder arthrometer. Secondary objectives were to examine the relationship of glenohumeral joint laxity with passive range of motion and generalized joint laxity. Fifty-one recreational athletes with no history of shoulder injury or long-term participation in overhead sports participated in this study. Anterior and posterior laxity data were obtained at displacement forces of 67, 89, 111, and 134 N. Bilateral passive shoulder range of motion measures were obtained, and a modified Beighton Mobility Score was used to quantify generalized joint laxity. There were no significant differences in glenohumeral joint laxity between the right and left shoulders (P values = 0.14 to 0.73). No significant differences in laxity were seen between directions (F(1,400) = 1.35, P = 0.25). However, significant differences were observed between force levels (F(3,400) = 27.17, P < 0.0001). No moderate or stronger correlations between laxity, passive range of motion, and generalized joint laxity were seen. These data confirm the presence of a wide spectrum of symmetric laxity in subjects that fails to correlate strongly with passive range of motion or generalized joint laxity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M L Sein, R C Appleyard, J R Walton, T Bradley, and G A Murrell Reliability of a new shoulder laxometer to assess inferior glenohumeral joint translation Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 42(3): 178 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-T. Lin, A.-T. Hsu, G.-L. Chang, J.-r. Chang Chien, K.-N. An, and F. C. Su Determining the Resting Position of the Glenohumeral Joint in Subjects Who Are Healthy Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1669 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lintner, M. Mayol, O. Uzodinma, R. Jones, and D. Labossiere Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficits in Professional Pitchers Enrolled in an Internal Rotation Stretching Program Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 617 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bahk, E. Keyurapan, A. Tasaki, E. L. Sauers, and E. G. McFarland Laxity Testing of the Shoulder: A Review Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 131 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Borsa, J. S. Scibek, J. A. Jacobson, and K. Meister Sonographic Stress Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Laxity in Collegiate Swimmers and Age-Matched Controls Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2005; 33(7): 1077 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D R Stewart and S B Burden Does generalised ligamentous laxity increase seasonal incidence of injuries in male first division club rugby players? Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2004; 38(4): 457 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Ma, A. Kanamori, T. M. Vogrin, S. L-Y. Woo, and C. D. Harner Measurement of Posterior Tibial Translation in the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee: Significance of the Shift in the Reference Position Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2003; 31(6): 843 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |