HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duchow, J. Articles by Kohn, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duchow, J. Articles by Kohn, D. Related Collections Animal studies Graft fixation Chondral/cartilage

Primary Stability of Press-Fit-Implanted Osteochondral Grafts

Influence of Graft Size, Repeated Insertion, and Harvesting Technique

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg Saar, Germany

* Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jochen Duchow, MD, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Universität des Saarlandes, 66424 Homburg Saar, Germany

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fixation strength of press-fit-implanted osteochondral grafts with respect to graft size (length and diameter), the effect of repeated insertion after pullout, and harvesting technique. Experiments were performed using the Osteochondral Autograft Transfer System on porcine femoral condyles. Failure loads of 10-mm-long grafts (mean, 47 N) were significantly lower than failure loads of 15-mm-long grafts (mean, 93 N) and 20-mm-long grafts (mean, 110 N) (all grafts, 11 mm in diameter). Reinsertion of the 15-mm-long grafts after initial pullout resulted in a significant reduction of failure loads (mean, 93 N versus 44 N). Failure loads of 8-mm-diameter grafts (mean, 41 N) were significantly lower than those of 11-mm-diameter grafts (mean, 92 N) (all 15 mm long). Levering of the tubular chisel during graft harvest significantly decreased press-fit stability as compared with simple turning of the chisel (mean, 32 N versus 52 N) (8-mm diameter and 15-mm length). These results suggest that primary fixation strength of press-fit-inserted osteochondral grafts depends on the size of the grafts and that repeated pullout and reinsertion of grafts as well as a nonoptimal harvesting technique (levering) will reduce primary stability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Marcacci, E. Kon, M. Delcogliano, G. Filardo, M. Busacca, and S. Zaffagnini Arthroscopic Autologous Osteochondral Grafting for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Prospective Study Results at a Minimum 7-Year Follow-up Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2014 - 2021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. U. Kleemann, H. Schell, M. Thompson, D. R. Epari, G. N. Duda, and A. Weiler Mechanical Behavior of Articular Cartilage After Osteochondral Autograft Transfer in an Ovine Model Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 555 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Miura, Y. Ishibashi, E. Tsuda, H. Sato, and S. Toh Results of Arthroscopic Fixation of Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesion of the Knee With Cylindrical Autogenous Osteochondral Plugs Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 216 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Recht, D. W. Goodwin, C. S. Winalski, and L. M. White MRI of Articular Cartilage: Revisiting Current Status and Future Directions Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 899 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Alford and B. J. Cole Cartilage Restoration, Part 2: Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Directions Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2005; 33(3): 443 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Alford and B. J. Cole Cartilage Restoration, Part 1: Basic Science, Historical Perspective, Patient Evaluation, and Treatment Options Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 295 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]