AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beynnon, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Renström, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beynnon, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Renström, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Injury
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 27:150-155 (1999)
© 1999 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Trauma and Bracing on Knee Proprioception

Bruce D. Beynnon, PhD*, Steven H. Ryder, MD, Lars Konradsen, MD, Robert J. Johnson, MD, Kelly Johnson, ATC and Per A. Renström, MD, PhD

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, McClure Musculoskeletal Research Center, University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont

* Address correspondence and reprint requests to Bruce D. Beynnon, PhD, Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Stafford Hall, Room 438A, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0084

We studied the effect that chronic anterior cruciate ligament disruption, functional bracing, and a neoprene sleeve have on knee proprioception by measuring the threshold to detection of passive knee motion in all three conditions. The threshold to detection of passive knee motion was worse in knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency when compared with uninjured knees. This difference was small, on average an additional 0.28° of flexion-extension rotation was required for the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee before the subject detected motion, and of questionable significance from a clinical and functional perspective. Wearing a functional brace or neoprene sleeve on the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee did not significantly change the threshold to detection of passive motion in comparison with the same knee without a brace, although improvements were observed. There was no relationship between the most common clinical means of characterizing altered biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee (that is, the magnitude of anterior-posterior knee laxity and the grade of pivot shift) and the threshold to detection of passive knee motion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. B. Birmingham, D. M. Bryant, J. R. Giffin, R. B. Litchfield, J. F. Kramer, A. Donner, and P. J. Fowler
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Functional Knee Brace and Neoprene Sleeve Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 648 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. Iwasa, M. Ochi, Y. Uchio, N. Adachi, and K. Kawasaki
Decrease in anterior knee laxity by electrical stimulation of normal and reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 477 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D F Murphy, D A J Connolly, and B D Beynnon
Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature
Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2003; 37(1): 13 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.