HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leddy, J. J. Articles by Priore, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leddy, J. J. Articles by Priore, R. L. Related Collections Imaging Studies Ankle

Prospective Evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a University Sports Medicine Center

With a Modification to Increase Specificity for Identifying Malleolar Fractures

John J. Leddy, MD^*,,, Robert J. Smolinski, MD^*,, James Lawrence, MD, Jody L. Snyder, MD and Roger L. Priore, ScD

^* Department of Orthopaedics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
Sports Medicine Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

Address correspondence and reprint requests to John J. Leddy, MD, University at Buffalo Sports Medicine Institute, 160 Farber Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214

In a sports medicine center, we prospectively evaluated the Ottawa Ankle Rules over 1 year for their ability to identify clinically significant ankle and midfoot fractures and to reduce the need for radiography. We also developed a modification to improve specificity for malleolar fracture identification. Patients with acute ankle injuries (10 days old) had the rules applied and then had radiographs taken. Sensitivity, specificity, and the potential reduction in the use of radiography were calculated for the Ottawa Ankle Rules in 132 patients and for the new "Buffalo" rule in 78 of these patients. There were 11 clinically significant fractures (fracture rate, 8.3% per year). In these 132 patients, the Ottawa Ankle Rules would have reduced the need for radiography by 34%, without any fractures being missed (sensitivity 100%, specificity 37%). In 78 patients, the specificity for malleolar fracture for the new rule was significantly greater than that of the Ottawa Ankle Rules malleolar rule (59% versus 42%), sensitivity remained 100%, and the potential reduction in the need for radiography (54%) was significantly greater. The Ottawa Ankle Rules could significantly reduce the need for radiography in patients with acute ankle and midfoot injuries in this setting without missing clinically significant fractures. The Buffalo modification could improve specificity for malleolar fractures without sacrificing sensitivity and could significantly reduce the need for radiography.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M Bachmann, E. Kolb, M. T Koller, J. Steurer, and G. ter Riet Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review BMJ, February 22, 2003; 326(7386): 417 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Glas, B. A.C.M. Pijnenburg, J. G. Lijmer, K. Bogaard, M. de Roos, J. N. Keeman, R. M.J.M. Butzelaar, and P. M.M. Bossuyt Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2002; 166(6): 727 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Springer, R. A. Arciero, J. J. Tenuta, and D. C. Taylor A Prospective Study of Modified Ottawa Ankle Rules in a Military Population: Interobserver Agreement Between Physical Therapists and Orthopaedic Surgeons Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2000; 28(6): 864 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]