AJSM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by O'Halloran, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by O'Halloran, K. L.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 24:472-476 (1996)
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Scoring Systems for Shoulder Conditions

Anthony A. Romeo, MD

Section of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Bernard R. Bach, JR, MD

Section of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Kevin L. O'Halloran, MD

private practice, Oconomowoc, Wisconsin

We evaluated the comparability of four commonly used shoulder scoring systems in the United States. Fifty- two patients had 53 shoulder stabilization procedures. Surgical procedures included 34 open Bankart-type repairs, 15 capsular shifts, and 4 arthroscopic stabili zations. Results were assessed using the following scales: 1) Rowe, 2) modified-Rowe, 3) University of California at Los Angeles, and 4) the pre-1994 Ameri can Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale. No consen sus has been reached on the relative value of these systems. We observed significant variations using these systems. A majority of our patients (85%) had excellent results when the University of California at Los Angeles scoring system was used. However, only 38% of the patients had excellent results when the modified-Rowe scale was used. Overall, good or ex cellent results were observed in 89% to 95% of the patients using these four scoring systems. The Univer sity of California at Los Angeles score correlated poorly with the other systems. lnterrater reliability between the four systems was poor. Generalized results of an investigation can be biased based on the selection of a scoring system. The lack of a widely accepted scoring system for the shoulder limits comparison of manage ment for shoulder conditions. Thus, a widely accepted shoulder scoring system is needed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. T. E. Shewy, H. M. E. Barbary, Y. H. E. Meligy, and S. A. Khaled
Open Reduction and Posterior Capsular Shift for Cases of Neglected Unreduced Posterior Shoulder Dislocation
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 133 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
L. Watson, A. Bialocerkowski, R. Dalziel, S. Balster, F. Burke, and C. Finch
Hydrodilatation (distension arthrography): a long-term clinical outcome series
Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2007; 41(3): 167 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. D. Placzek, S. C. Lukens, S. Badalanmenti, P. J. Roubal, D. C. Freeman, K. M. Walleman, A. Parrot, and J. M. Wiater
Shoulder Outcome Measures: A Comparison of 6 Functional Tests
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2004; 32(5): 1270 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S D M Bot, C B Terwee, D A W M van der Windt, L M Bouter, J Dekker, and H C W de Vet
Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2004; 63(4): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. Deitch, C. T. Mehlman, S. L. Foad, A. Obbehat, and M. Mallory
Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation in Adolescents
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2003; 31(5): 758 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. C. Hersch and N. A. Sgaglione
Arthroscopically Assisted Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repairs: Functional Outcome at 2- to 7-Year Follow-up
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2000; 28(3): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. B. O'NEILL
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair of Anterior Detachments of the Glenoid Labrum. A Prospective Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1999; 81(10): 1357 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. N. Williams, T. J. Gangel, R. A. Arciero, J. M. Uhorchak, and D. C. Taylor
Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Method and Two Shoulder Rating Scales: Outcomes Measures After Shoulder Surgery
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1999; 27(2): 214 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Kirkley, S. Griffin, H. McLintock, and L. Ng
The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool for Shoulder Instability: The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 1998; 26(6): 764 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. C. L'INSALATA, R. F. WARREN, S. B. COHEN, D. W. ALTCHEK, and M. G. E. PETERSON
A Self-Administered Questionnaire for Assessment of Symptoms and Function of the Shoulder
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1997; 79(5): 738 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.