|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Division of Sports Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Division of Sports Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Division of Sports Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Division of Sports Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Division of Sports Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
No universally accepted management protocol is avail able for dealing with the protective equipment worn by a neck-injured football player. The purpose of this ca daveric study was to determine the effects of the hel met and shoulder pads on the alignment of 1) the intact lower cervical spine and 2) the partially destabilized C5-6 motion segment. In Group I cadavers (N = 15), the lower cervical spine was tested in an intact condi tion. In Group II (N = 8), the C5-6 motion segment was tested in both an intact and a partially destabilized condition. Each cadaver was placed supine on a back- board and four lateral cervical radiographs were ob tained as follows: no protective equipment, helmet only, helmet and shoulder pads, and shoulder pads only. Results for Group I showed that wearing both helmet and shoulder pads did not result in a significant change in cervical lordosis when compared with the neutral position (i.e., the no-equipment test). Cervical lordosis was significantly decreased in the helmet-only category (mean, 9.6°) and significantly increased in the shoulder pads-only category (mean, 13.6°). In Group II, destabilized specimens under the helmet test situa tion showed a significant mean increase in C5-6 for ward angulation (16.5°), posterior disk space height (3.8 mm), and dorsal element distraction (8.3 mm). Immobilizing the neck-injured football player with only the helmet or only the shoulder pads in place violates the principle of splinting the cervical spine in neutral alignment, according to our findings. We support the concept that removal of the helmet and shoulder pads should be an all-or-none proposition.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Treme, D. R. Diduch, J. Hart, M. J. Romness, M. S. Kwon, and J. M. Hart Cervical Spine Alignment in the Youth Football Athlete: Recommendations for Emergency Transportation Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1582 - 1586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Sherbondy, J. N. Hertel, and W. J. Sebastianelli The Effect of Protective Equipment on Cervical Spine Alignment in Collegiate Lacrosse Players Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2006; 34(10): 1675 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Swartz, S. A. Norkus, T. Cappaert, and L. C. Decoster Football Equipment Design Affects Face Mask Removal Efficiency Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2005; 33(8): 1210 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Banerjee, M. A. Palumbo, and P. D. Fadale Catastrophic Cervical Spine Injuries in the Collision Sport Athlete, Part 2: Principles of Emergency Care Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1760 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. N. Waninger Management of the Helmeted Athlete With Suspected Cervical Spine Injury Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2004; 32(5): 1331 - 1350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. LaPrade, K. A. Schnetzler, R. J. Broxterman, F. Wentorf, E. Wendland, and T. J. Gilbert Cervical Spine Alignment in the Immobilized Ice Hockey Player: A Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Effects of Helmet Removal Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2000; 28(6): 800 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |