AJSM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kinzl, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kinzl, L.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 24:298-305 (1996)
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Primary Repair for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

An Eight-Year Followup of Fifty-three Patients

Marcus Richter, MD

Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Hartmuth Kiefer, MD

Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Gerhard Hehl, MD

Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Lothar Kinzl, MD

Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

We reviewed 53 of 58 patients who had primary repairs of posterior cruciate ligament injuries between 1981 and 1988. Sixteen patients had isolated posterior cru ciate ligament ruptures, 16 had complex injuries with capsular and collateral ligament involvement, and 21 had additional anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. For ty-six patients were treated by transosseous multiple- loop sutures and seven with bony avulsions by screw osteosynthesis. The mean follow-up time was 7.5 years (range, 3 to 12). All patients were examined subjectively (questionnaire) and objectively (clinical ex amination, KT-1000 arthrometer, functional testing, ra diographs, and Cybex II isokinetic strength analysis). The results were graded according to the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form and the Lysholm score. The average Lysholm score was 82.4 (range, 40 to 100). Thirty-eight patients returned to their preinjury activities at the same intensity level. The patients' subjective assessments were normal or nearly normal in 35 patients. The posterior drawer test was negative or 1 + in 46 patients. Cybex isokinetic strength analysis revealed a decrease in quadriceps muscle strength of the involved limb by 10.5% (P < 0.01). Our data suggest that primary repair of posterior cruciate ligament ruptures provides good results after 8 years in approximately two thirds of the patients. Distal ligamentous ruptures, lack of athletic activity, and tem porary olecranization correlated with poor results. Bony avulsions, midsubstance or proximal ruptures, and athletic activity correlated with good results.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. K. Van de Velde, J. T. Bingham, T. J. Gill, and G. Li
Analysis of Tibiofemoral Cartilage Deformation in the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2009; 91(1): 167 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. Li, R. Papannagari, M. Li, J. Bingham, K. W. Nha, D. Allred, and T. Gill
Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency on In Vivo Translation and Rotation of the Knee During Weightbearing Flexion
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 474 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. K. Davis, D. H. Goltz, D. C. Fithian, and D. D'Lima
Anatomical Posterior Cruciate Ligament Transplantation: A Biomechanical Analysis
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2006; 34(7): 1126 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. S. Boks, D. Vroegindeweij, B. W. Koes, M. G. M. Hunink, and S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
Follow-up of Posttraumatic Ligamentous and Meniscal Knee Lesions Detected at MR Imaging: Systematic Review
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 863 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W. M. Wind Jr, J. A. Bergfeld, and R. D. Parker
Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Revisited
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1765 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. A. Rihn, P. S. Cha, Y. J. Groff, and C. D. Harner
The Acutely Dislocated Knee: Evaluation and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2004; 12(5): 334 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. J. Gill, L. E. DeFrate, C. Wang, C. T. Carey, S. Zayontz, B. Zarins, and G. Li
The Biomechanical Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Joint Function: Kinematic Response to Simulated Muscle Loads
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2003; 31(4): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Richter, U. Bosch, B. Wippermann, A. Hofmann, and C. Krettek
Comparison of Surgical Repair or Reconstruction of the Cruciate Ligaments versus Nonsurgical Treatment in Patients with Traumatic Knee Dislocations
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2002; 30(5): 718 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K.D. Shelbourne, T. J. Davis, and D. V. Patel
The Natural History of Acute, Isolated, Nonoperatively Treated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Prospective Study
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1999; 27(3): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.