AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keene, G. C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keene, G. C. R.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 24:222-226 (1996)
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Radiographic Changes in the Knee After Meniscal Transplantation

An Experimental Study in a Sheep Model

Dennis J. Edwards, FRCS

SPORTSMED SA, Adelaide, Australia

Simon L. Whittle

SPORTSMED SA, Adelaide, Australia

Michael J. Nissen

SPORTSMED SA, Adelaide, Australia

Brian Cohen, FRCS

SPORTSMED SA, Adelaide, Australia

Roger D. Oakeshott, FRACS

SPORTSMED SA, Adelaide, Australia

Gregory C. R. Keene, FRACS, FASMF, FA

SPORTSMED SA, Adelaide, Australia

Meniscal transplantation has been suggested as an alternative to total meniscectomy, which is now known to lead to long-term osteoarthritic degeneration of the knee joint. To evaluate the success of meniscal trans plantation, we divided 28 sheep knees into 4 groups: total meniscectomy, allograft, autograft, and control. After a mean postoperative time of 21.4 months, we radiographed the excised knee joints in a loaded state and graded the radiographs for osteoarthritic changes. The knees with meniscectomies, allografts, and au tografts showed significantly more degenerative changes than the control knees. However, there were no statistically significant differences between these three groups. The results of this study suggest that meniscal allograft transplantation does not protect the knee against degenerative changes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. Reider
Ecological Misfits
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 839 - 840.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. von Lewinski, D. Kohn, C. J. Wirth, and D. Lazovic
The Influence of Nonanatomical Insertion and Incongruence of Meniscal Transplants on the Articular Cartilage in an Ovine Model
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 841 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. T. Kelly, H. G. Potter, X.-H. Deng, A. D. Pearle, A. S. Turner, R. F. Warren, and S. A. Rodeo
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the Sheep Knee: Evaluation of Chondroprotective Effects
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1464 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. K. Sekiya and C. I. Ellingson
Meniscal allograft transplantation.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2006; 14(3): 164 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Z. L. SZOMOR, T. E. MARTIN, F. BONAR, and G. A. C. MURRELL
The Protective Effects of Meniscal Transplantation on Cartilage. An Experimental Study in Sheep
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2000; 82(1): 80 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.