|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Orthopaedic Associates of Manhasset, Manhasset, New York
Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, California
Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, California
Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, California
Sixty-five patients who consecutively underwent ante rior cruciate ligament reconstruction were studied using four individual, categoric, knee score rating systems. Different results were noted at followup (mean, 35 months; range, 24 to 58) depending on the rating method used. All patients were graded using the Hos pital for Special Surgery, Lysholm, Tegner activity, and Cincinnati Knee Ligament rating systems. The Cincin nati Knee Ligament rating individual scores were noted to be lower than the Hospital for Special Surgery and Lysholm scores for subjective and objective outcome assessment. The Hospital for Special Surgery and Lys holm scores did not correlate highly with the Cincinnati Knee Ligament rating final rating, but they did correlate with each other. The use of ligament rating scores tended to inflate results, particularly when raw scores were converted to overall categoric ratings (e.g., ex cellent, good). The Cincinnati Knee Ligament rating system correlates more highly with individual grading and most precisely defines outcome in athletically ac tive patients. Sources of error may be introduced by a disproportionate combination of unrelated scores or by overrating low-activity-level individuals who avoid stressing their knees. Avoidance of data generalization remains the optimal method for studying anterior cru ciate ligament surgery outcome.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Renstrom, A Ljungqvist, E Arendt, B Beynnon, T Fukubayashi, W Garrett, T Georgoulis, T E Hewett, R Johnson, T Krosshaug, et al. Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 394 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Lohmander, P. M. Englund, L. L. Dahl, and E. M. Roos The Long-term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries: Osteoarthritis Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1756 - 1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Anderson, J. J. Irrgang, M. S. Kocher, B. J. Mann, J. J. Harrast, and Members of the International Knee Documentation Co The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: Normative Data Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 128 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Fu, D. Zurakowski, J. E. Browne, B. Mandelbaum, C. Erggelet, J. B. Moseley Jr, A. F. Anderson, and L. J. Micheli Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Debridement for Treatment of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects of the Knee: An Observational Cohort Study With 3-Year Follow-up Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1658 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F W Smith, E A Rosenlund, A K Aune, J A MacLean, and S W Hillis Subjective functional assessments and the return to competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2004; 38(3): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tashman, D. Collon, K. Anderson, P. Kolowich, and W. Anderst Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion During Running After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2004; 32(4): 975 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Marx, E. C. Jones, A. A. Allen, D. W. Altchek, S. J. O'Brien, S. A. Rodeo, R. J. Williams, R. F. Warren, and T. L. Wickiewicz Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Four Knee Outcome Scales for Athletic Patients J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(10): 1459 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Irrgang, A. F. Anderson, A. L. Boland, C. D. Harner, M. Kurosaka, P. Neyret, J. C. Richmond, and K. D. Shelborne Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2001; 29(5): 600 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Englund, E. M. Roos, H. P. Roos, and L. S. Lohmander Patient-relevant outcomes fourteen years after meniscectomy: influence of type of meniscal tear and size of resection Rheumatology, June 1, 2001; 40(6): 631 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Barber-Westin, F. R. Noyes, and J. W. McCloskey Rigorous Statistical Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness Testing of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System in 350 Subjects with Uninjured, Injured, or Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1999; 27(4): 402 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Demirdjian, S. G. Petrie, C. A. Guanche, and K. A. Thomas The Outcomes of Two Knee Scoring Questionnaires in a Normal Population Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 46 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin Reconstruction of the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments After Knee Dislocation: Use of Early Protected Postoperative Motion to Decrease Arthrofibrosis Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1997; 25(6): 769 - 778. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin A Comparison of Results in Acute and Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures of Arthroscopically Assisted Autogenous Patellar Tendon Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1997; 25(4): 460 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |