|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Department of Orthopaedics, Tufts University School of Medicine and the New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Orthopaedics, Tufts University School of Medicine and the New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Orthopaedics, Tufts University School of Medicine and the New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Orthopaedics, Tufts University School of Medicine and the New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
The purpose of this study was to determine anterior laxity and graft forces in cadaveric knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in which the graft is tensioned with the knee in full extension. We also ana lyzed the clinical results from a series of patients who had ligament reconstructions using this technique. We performed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions on seven fresh cadaveric knees and then measured the anterior laxity, graft set force, and graft tension. We also did a prospective minimum 2-year followup on 57 pa tients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament recon struction. The in vitro data showed average anterior lax ity of 1.1 mm greater than the intact knee with an 89-N anterior force at 30° of knee flexion. Average graft set force was 68 N, and graft tension in extension was 18 N. In the clinical portion of the study, knee laxity improved from 7.5 to 0.8 mm (side-to-side difference at 89 N). The patients' Lysholm and Tegner scores improved from 65 to 90 and 3.9 to 5.6, respectively. Only one patient had a postoperative contracture. The results of this study suggest that graft tensioning in full extension provides a low incidence of flexion deformity, maintaining excel lent functional results and satisfactory biomechanics.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Mae, K. Shino, K. Nakata, Y. Toritsuka, H. Otsubo, and H. Fujie Optimization of Graft Fixation at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part I: Effect of Initial Tension Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1087 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mae, K. Shino, K. Nakata, Y. Toritsuka, H. Otsubo, and H. Fujie Optimization of Graft Fixation at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II: Effect of Knee Flexion Angle Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1094 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Busam, M. T. Provencher, and B. R. Bach Jr Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Constructs: Care and Prevention Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 379 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Austin, C. Phornphutkul, and E. M. Wojtys Loss of Knee Extension After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Effects of Knee Position and Graft Tensioning J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1565 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Grover, S. M. Howell, and M. L. Hull Early Tension Loss in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft. A Cadaver Study of Four Tibial Fixation Devices J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2005; 87(2): 381 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Arnold, N. Verdonschot, and A. van Kampen The Normal Anterior Cruciate Ligament as a Model for Tensioning Strategies in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Nicholas, M. J. D'Amato, M. J. Mullaney, T. F. Tyler, K. Kolstad, and M. P. McHugh A Prospectively Randomized Double-Blind Study on the Effect of Initial Graft Tension on Knee Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2004; 32(8): 1881 - 1886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Nurmi, P. Kannus, H. Sievanen, T. Jarvela, M. Jarvinen, and T. L. N. Jarvinen Interference Screw Fixation of Soft Tissue Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part 2: Effect of Preconditioning on Graft Tension During and After Screw Insertion Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2004; 32(2): 418 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hoher, A. Kanamori, J. Zeminski, F. H. Fu, and S. L-Y. Woo The Position of the Tibia during Graft Fixation Affects Knee Kinematics and Graft Forces for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2001; 29(6): 771 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Millett, T. L. Wickiewicz, and R. F. Warren Motion Loss after Ligament Injuries to the Knee: Part I: Causes Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2001; 29(5): 664 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Fu, C. H. Bennett, C. B. Ma, J. Menetrey, and C. Lattermann Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II. Operative Procedures and Clinical Correlations Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 124 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. FRANK and D. W. JACKSON Current Concepts Review - The Science of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1556 - 76. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |