HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elmqvist, L.-G. Articles by Fugl-Meyer, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Elmqvist, L.-G. Articles by Fugl-Meyer, A. R.

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Long-term effects of different knee angles at primary immobilization and different modes of early training

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,University Hospital, Umea, Sweden

Ronny Lorentzon, MD, PhD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Umea, Sweden

Mats Langström

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Umea, Sweden

Axel R. Fugl-Meyer, MD PhD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ,University Hospital, Umea, Sweden

The clinical results in 29 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction with quadriceps-patellar tendon graft over-the-top were studied at an average of 28 months postoperatively. Postoperative immobilization was at either 30° (N = 17) or 70° (N = 12) of knee flexion for 6 weeks. All patients then followed a com mon preparatory training program for 8 weeks. In the 14th postoperative week the patients were put on either progressive resistance training (N = 12) or isokinetic training (N = 17) for 6 weeks, after which all had identical training.

Independent of primary knee immobilization angle or training regimens, no differences could be demon strated with respect to stability, range of motion, func tion, or isokinetic mechanical output. For all patients, Lysholm knee function score improved from 60.5 to 93.6 (P < 0.001) and activity level from 3.9 to 6.3 (P < 0.001). Isokinetic peak torque, contractional work, and mean power of the quadriceps at 30, 90, and 180 deg/ sec were lower in the injured compared to the nonin jured leg (78% to 90%; P < 0.01) both preoperatively and at followup, and there were no significant differ ences between the preoperative and follow-up values. Clinical stability improved (P < 0.001) in 19 of the 29 patients (66%) and in 11 of those 17 patients with early isokinetic training (65%). Performance tests were nor mal in 23 of 29 patients (79%), with minor abnormalities in the rest.

We conclude that immobilization at a higher tension of the quadriceps or early isokinetic training did not results in any advantages in the long run, and that patients with early isokinetic training did not show any increased incidence of remaining instability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. B. Bynum, R. L. Barrack, and A. H. Alexander Open Versus Closed Chain Kinetic Exercises After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Study Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1995; 23(4): 401 - 406. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. Maitland, R. Lowe, S. Stewart, T. Fung, and G. D. Bell Does Cybex testing increase knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1993; 21(5): 690 - 695. [Abstract] [PDF]