AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ericson, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Nisell, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ericson, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Nisell, R.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 14:285-290 (1986)
© 1986 SAGE Publications

Tibiofemoral joint forces during ergometer cycling

Mats O. Ericson, MB

Kinesiology Research Group, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Anatomy, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Ralph Nisell, MD, PhD

Department of Anatomy, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Six healthy subjects pedaled on a weight-braked bicy cle ergometer at different workloads, pedaling rates, saddle heights, and pedal foot positions. The subjects were filmed with a cine-film camera and pedal reaction forces were recorded from a force transducer mounted on the left pedal. Net knee moments were calculated using a dynamic model, and the tibiofemoral shear and compressive force magnitudes were calculated using a biomechanical model of the knee. During cycling at 120 W, 60 rpm, midsaddle height, and anterior pedal foot position, the mean peak tibiofemoral compressive force was 812 N [1.2 times body weight (BW)]. The maximum anteriorly directed tibiofemoral shear force was found to be low (37 N). The compressive and shear forces were significantly increased by an increased ergometer workload. The pedaling rate had no influence on the tibiofemoral force magnitudes. The stress on the ACL was low and could be further decreased by use of the anterior foot position instead of the posterior.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
T. E Johnston
Biomechanical Considerations for Cycling Interventions in Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1243 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Hambly, V. Bobic, B. Wondrasch, D. Van Assche, and S. Marlovits
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation: Science and Practice
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 1020 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. J. Gatt Jr, M. J. Pavol, R. D. Parker, and M. D. Grabiner
Three-Dimensional Knee Joint Kinetics During a Golf Swing: Influences of Skill Level and Footwear
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1998; 26(2): 285 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. C. Fleming, B. D. Beynnon, P. A. Renstrom, G. D. Peura, C. E. Nichols, and R. J. Johnson
The Strain Behavior of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament During Bicycling : An In Vivo Study
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. R. Kaufman, K.-N. An, W. J. Litchy, B. F. Morrey, and E. Y.S. Chao
Dynamic joint forces during knee isokinetic exercise
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1991; 19(3): 305 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.