AJSM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonci, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Torg, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bonci, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Torg, J. S.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 14:12-17 (1986)
© 1986 SAGE Publications

A preliminary study on the measurement of static and dynamic motion at the glenohumeral joint

Christine M. Bonci, MS, ATC

University of Pennsylvania Sports Medicine Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Frederick J. Hensal, MD

University of Pennsylvania Sports Medicine Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Joseph S. Torg, MD

University of Pennsylvania Sports Medicine Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Measurement of glenohumeral joint motion has, for the most part, been performed with the simple goniometer. The purpose of this paper is to describe a method for measuring and recording static and dynamic external rotation of the glenohumeral joint using the Cybex II Isokinetic Dynamometer and an MFE model 815 X-Y plotter. Static range of motion was assessed at 60 deg/ sec using a slow arm action externally from a 90° abduction position. Dynamic motion was recorded at 300 deg/sec using a rapid rotational whipping action from a 90° abducted position.

Measurements were recorded on three groups of athletes, and the influences of sex, hand dominance, overarm activity, and surgery were analyzed. The sub jects in the first two groups were divided according to sex and their participation in overarm versus nonover arm (control) activities. Static and dynamic motion in both groups was significantly influenced by sex and hand dominance (P < 0.05). Although there was no overall difference in the motion measurements between the control and overarm groups, the interaction of this factor with sex and type of measurement was signifi cant. Males who participated in overarm activities had, on the average, more static range of motion than males in the control group.

A third group that had undergone a modified Bristow procedure for recurrent dislocation/subluxation of the shoulder demonstrated that static and dynamic range of motion were significantly reduced by the surgery (P < 0.05). The average differences in static and dynamic motion between the surgical arm and its nonsurgical counterpart were 17.5° and 21°, respectively, resulting in an overall range of motion difference of 19°.

The Cybex II Isokinetic Dynamometer and X-Y plotter provided a viable mechanical means of receiving and recording the full external rotation motion potentials of the limbs at varying speeds of movement. A combina tion of both static and dynamic measurement tech niques can provide a more quantitative assessment of the functional range available at the glenohumeral joint based on slow and high speed movement capabilities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. F. Beaulieu, D. K. Hodge, A. G. Bergman, K. Butts, B. L. Daniel, C. L. Napper, R. D. Darrow, C. L. Dumoulin, and R. J. Herfkens
Glenohumeral Relationships during Physiologic Shoulder Motion and Stress Testing: Initial Experience with Open MR Imaging and Active Imaging-Plane Registration
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 699 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W.B. Kibler, T. J. Chandler, T. Uhl, and R. E. Maddux
A musculoskeletal approach to the preparticipation physical examination: Preventing injury and improving performance
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1989; 17(4): 525 - 531.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.