HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walsh, W. M. Articles by Neumann, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Walsh, W. M. Articles by Neumann, R. D.

Shoulder strength following acromioclavicular injury

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

David A. Peterson

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Guy Shelton

Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Sports Medicine Program, University of Nebraska Hospital and Clinic, Omaha, Nebraska

Randall D. Neumann

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

The acromioclavicular (AC) joint enjoys the dubious distinction of being one of the few joints in the body whose total dislocation is routinely treated by simply leaving the joint dislocated. Adherents of both conserv ative and operative treatment have presented reasons for their viewpoints. Residual shoulder weakness has been offered as a sequela of untreated acromioclavic ular injury and a reason for repairing the joint. An objective evaluation of shoulder strength would be valuable in determining the optimum treatment for this injury. The purpose of our study was to quantitate, using the Cybex II, the residual shoulder weakness following various modes of treatment. Seventeen pa tients with Grade III AC separations and eight patients with Grade II AC sprains were reviewed. Nine of the Grade III injuries were treated and eight nonoperatively. All Grade II injuries were treated nonsurgically. All pa tients were tested on the Cybex II isokinetic dynamom eter at both slow and fast speeds through various ranges of motion. Grade III injuries treated nonopera tively showed no significant strength deficits. Surgically treated Grade III injuries had a significant strength deficit in vertical abduction at fast speeds (19.8%) when compared to the uninjured shoulder. Interestingly, the Grade II injuries led to a significant weakness in hori zontal abduction (24.3%) at fast velocity.

Evaluation of subjective results showed that Grade III injuries treated conservatively had the most pain and stiffness, despite their strong shoulders. Patients with Grade III injuries treated operatively rated their overall outcome below that of those treated conservatively. We conclude that: (1) from the standpoint of objective strength, nonsurgical treatment of Grade III AC injury is as effective as surgical treatment; (2) the dilemma of Grade II AC injury continues, as shown by our findings of significant strength deficits; and (3) patient satisfac tion following treatment of AC injury does not mirror objective strength deficits.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mikek Long-Term Shoulder Function After Type I and II Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2147 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Lee, E. P. Keefer, M. P. McHugh, I. J. Kremenic, K. F. Orishimo, S. Ben-Avi, and S. J. Nicholas Cyclical Loading of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstructions: A Comparative Biomechanical Study Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2008; 36(10): 1990 - 1997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Costic, J. E. Labriola, M. W. Rodosky, and R. E. Debski Biomechanical Rationale for Development of Anatomical Reconstructions of Coracoclavicular Ligaments After Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2004; 32(8): 1929 - 1936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Lee, S. J. Nicholas, K. H. Akizuki, M. P. McHugh, I. J. Kremenic, and S. Ben-Avi Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments with Tendon Grafts: A Comparative Biomechanical Study Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2003; 31(5): 648 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Schlegel, R. T. Burks, R. L. Marcus, and H. K. Dunn A Prospective Evaluation of Untreated Acute Grade III Acromioclavicular Separations Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2001; 29(6): 699 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Debski, I. M. Parsons, S. L-Y. Woo, and F. H. Fu Effect of Capsular Injury on Acromioclavicular Joint Mechanics J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2001; 83(9): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. I. Harris, A. L. Wallace, G. D. Harper, J. A. Goldberg, D. H. Sonnabend, and W. R. Walsh Structural Properties of the Intact and the Reconstructed Coracoclavicular Ligament Complex Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 103 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. L. Yap, L. A. Curl, R. S. Kvitne, and E. G. McFarland The Value of Weighted Views of the Acromioclavicular Joint : Results of a Survey Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 1999; 27(6): 806 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Lemos The Evaluation and Treatment of the Injured Acromioclavicular Joint in Athletes Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 137 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hessmann, L. Gotzen, and H. Gehling Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Augmented with Polydioxanonsulphate Bands: Surgical Technique and Results Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1995; 23(5): 552 - 556. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Weinstein, P. D. McCann, S. J. Mcllveen, E. L. Flatow, and L. U. Bigliani Surgical Treatment of Complete Acromioclavicular Dislocations Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1995; 23(3): 324 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Tibone, R. Sellers, and P. Tonino Strength testing after third-degree acromioclavicular dislocations Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1992; 20(3): 328 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. D. Regan JR, S. Webster-Bogaert, R. J. Hawkins, and P. J. Fowler Comparative functional analysis of the Bristow, Magnuson-Stack, and Putti-Platt procedures for recurrent dislocation of the shoulder Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1989; 17(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. B. MacDonald, M. J. Alexander, J. Frejuk, and G. E. Johnson Comprehensive functional analysis of shoulders following complete acromioclavicular separation Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1988; 16(5): 475 - 480. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. F. Cook and J. E. Tibone The Mumford procedure in athletes: An objective analysis of function Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1988; 16(2): 97 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]