HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pettrone, F. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pettrone, F. A.

Meniscectomy: arthrotomy versus arthroscopy

Georgetown Medical School, Washington, DC, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Arlington, Virginia

The arthroscope has changed the orthopaedist's ap proach to evaluation of knee injuries. Diagnostic ar throscopy is now well-accepted and has led to oper ative arthroscopy. The advantages and contraindica tions of operative arthroscopy are reviewed in this report. The physiologic role of the meniscus is dis cussed, stressing the importance of leaving normal tissue. Necessary equipment and cost of each of three advancing stages of arthroscopic surgery capability are discussed. A study group of 68 simple meniscec tomy patients is presented: 34 treated by traditional arthrotomy and meniscectomy, and 34 by arthro scopic meniscectomy. Parameters assessed included: nights in hospital, postoperative swelling, achieve ment of 120° flexion, days on crutches, return to full activity, work, and sports. Operating room and total hospital costs are reviewed. Arthroscopic meniscec tomy produced earlier complete rehabilitation and at less cost in this series.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Aglietti, R. Buzzi, and P.B. Bassi Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the anterior cruciate deficient knee Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1988; 16(6): 597 - 602. [Abstract] [PDF]