AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on August 25, 2008
(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546508322888)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberger, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Minas, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberger, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Minas, T.

Article

Repair of Large Chondral Defects of the Knee With Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in Patients 45 Years or Older

Ralf E. Rosenberger, MD, Andreas H. Gomoll, MD*, Tim Bryant, BSN, Tom Minas, MD, MS

Brigham and Women's Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: agomoll{at}partners.org.


   Abstract

Background: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has become an accepted option for the treatment of chondral defects in carefully selected patients. Current recommendations limit this procedure to younger patients, as insufficient data are available to conclusively evaluate outcomes in patients older than 45 years.

Hypothesis: Cartilage repair with ACI in patients older than 45 years results in substantially different outcomes than those previously reported for younger age groups.

Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: This prospective cohort study reviewed patients ≥45 years of age at the time of treatment with ACI. The clinical evaluation included a patient satisfaction questionnaire and four validated rating scales: Short Form-36, Modified Cincinnati Rating Scale, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Osteoarthritis Index, and the Knee Society Score.

Results: A total of 56 patients ≥45 years of age were treated with ACI. The average patient age at index surgery was 48.6 years (range, 45-60 years). The minimum follow-up was 2 years (range, 2-11 years; mean, 4.7 years). The cohort included 36 men and 20 women. The mean transplant size was 4.7 cm2 per defect (range, 1-15.0 cm2) and 9.8 cm2 per knee (range, 2.5-31.6 cm2). Twenty-eight patients (50%) underwent concomitant osteotomies to address malalignment. There were 8 failures (14%): 6 of 15 (40%) in patients receiving workers’ compensation (WC) and 2 of 41 (4.9%) in non-WC patients. Additional arthroscopic surgical procedures were required in 24 patients (43%) for periosteal-related problems and adhesions; 88% of these patients experienced lasting improvement. At their latest available follow-up, 72% of patients rated themselves as good or excellent, 78% felt improved, and 81% would again choose ACI as a treatment option.

Conclusion: Our results showed a failure rate of ACI in older patients that is comparable with rates reported in younger patient groups. The procedure is associated with a substantial rate of reoperations, mostly for the arthroscopic treatment of graft hypertrophy, similar to that in younger patients.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.