AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on July 31, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546508319900

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:1978.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/10/1978    most recent
0363546508319900v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welsing, R. T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Buma, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welsing, R. T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Buma, P.

Article

Effect on Tissue Differentiation and Articular Cartilage Degradation of a Polymer Meniscus Implant: A 2-Year Follow-up Study in Dogs

Roy T. C. Welsing, MD1, Tony G. van Tienen, MD, PhD1, Navin Ramrattan, MD1, Ralf Heijkants, PhD2, Arend Jan Schouten, PhD2, René P. H. Veth, MD, PhD1, Pieter Buma, PhD1*

1 Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
2 Polymer Chemistry, State University Groningen

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.buma{at}orthop.umcn.nl.


   Abstract

Background: Replacement of the meniscus by an implant could potentially avoid cartilage degeneration.

Hypothesis: An implant of degradable polycaprolacton-polyurethane should act as a temporary scaffold enabling regeneration of a new meniscus by slow degradation of the polymer and simultaneous in-growth and differentiation of tissues into the typical cartilage-like tissue of the meniscus.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: In 13 dogs’ knees, the lateral meniscus was replaced with a porous polymer implant (6 and 7 for 6- and 24-month follow-up, respectively); in 7 knees only a meniscectomy was performed. In 6 knees, no surgery was performed. After 6 and 24 months, the implants and the articular cartilage were histologically evaluated. Compression-stress tests were performed on implant biopsy specimens.

Results: The implants were fully integrated into the tissue without formation of a capsule. The foreign body reaction did not exceed grade I. Differentiation from fibrous- to cartilage-like tissue was pronounced after 24 months. Viable cells were particularly absent after 24 months in central parts of the most anterior part of the scaffold. The mechanical properties of the implants were intermediate between the scaffold before implantation and native meniscus tissue and were not different between 6 and 24 months. After both 6 and 24 months, small areas of the implant were not covered with tissue. Cartilage degeneration was not prevented.

Conclusion: A final remodeling of tissue into neomeniscus tissue could not take place since the original structure of the polymer was still present after 24 months. The implant did not prevent cartilage degradation. Several factors are discussed that may be responsible for this.

Clinical Relevance: Although clinical application of a polymer implant for the replacement of the entire meniscus is not supported by this study, the authors strongly believe in the concept, but further improvements in the implant and surgical technique are needed before such an implant can be recommended for human clinical use.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.