AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on July 14, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546508319051

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:2151.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/11/2151    most recent
0363546508319051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozanek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozanek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.

Article

The Contralateral Knee Joint in Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Michal Kozanek, MD, Samuel K. Van de Velde, MD, Thomas J. Gill, MD, Guoan Li, PhD*

Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gli1{at}partners.org.


   Abstract

Background: Patients with unilateral ligament deficiency are believed to have altered kinematics of the contralateral knee, increasing the risk of contralateral joint injury. Therefore, the contralateral knees might not be a reliable normal kinematic control.

Purpose: To compare the in vivo kinematics of the uninjured contralateral knees of patients with anterior or posterior cruciate ligament deficiency with knee kinematics of age-matched patients without joint injury.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Ten subjects with bilateral healthy knees, 10 patients with acute unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury, and 10 with acute unilateral posterior cruciate ligament injury participated in this study. Kinematics were measured from 0° to 90° of flexion using imaging and 3-dimensional modeling.

Results: No significant differences were found across the groups in all rotations and translations during weightbearing flexion (P > .9).

Conclusion: Patients with unilateral cruciate ligament deficiency did not alter kinematics of the contralateral uninjured knee during weightbearing flexion. In addition, these findings suggest that the included patients with anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament deficiency did not have preexisting abnormal kinematics of the knee.

Clinical Relevance: As the contralateral joint kinematics of the injured patients were not affected by the ipsilateral ligament injury in the short term, physicians and researchers might use the contralateral knee as a reliable normal kinematic control.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.