AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on June 24, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546508318191

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:2139.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/11/2139    most recent
0363546508318191v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wegener, C.
Right arrow Articles by Penkala, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wegener, C.
Right arrow Articles by Penkala, S.

Article

Effect of Neutral-Cushioned Running Shoes on Plantar Pressure Loading and Comfort in Athletes With Cavus Feet: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

Caleb Wegener, B App Sc (Pod) Hons1*, Joshua Burns, PhD2, Stefania Penkala, Grad Dip Ex Spr Sc3

1 University of Western Sydney
2 University of Western Sydney and the Children’s Hospital at Westmead
3 University of Western Sydney and the University of Sydney

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: joshuab2{at}chw.edu.au.


   Abstract

Background: High injury rates observed in athletes with cavus feet are thought to be associated with elevated plantar pressure loading. Neutral-cushioned running shoes are often recommended to manage and prevent such injuries.

Purpose: To investigate in-shoe plantar pressure loading and comfort during running in 2 popular neutral-cushioned running shoes recommended for athletes with cavus feet.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Plantar pressures were collected using the in-shoe Novel Pedar-X system during overground running in 22 athletes with cavus feet in 2 neutral-cushioned running shoes (Asics Nimbus 6 and Brooks Glycerin 3) and a control condition (Dunlop Volley). Comfort was measured using a validated visual analog scale.

Results: Compared with the control, both neutral-cushioned running shoes significantly reduced peak pressure and pressure-time integrals by 17% to 33% (P < .001). The Brooks Glycerin most effectively reduced pressure beneath the whole foot and forefoot (P < .01), and the Asics Nimbus most effectively reduced rearfoot pressure (P < .01). Both neutral-cushioned running shoes reduced force at the forefoot by 6% and increased it at the midfoot by 12% to 17% (P < .05). Contact time and area increased in both neutral-cushioned running shoes (P < .01). The Asics Nimbus was the most comfortable, although both neutral-cushioned running shoes were significantly more comfortable than the control (P < .001).

Conclusion: Two popular types of neutral-cushioned running shoes were effective at reducing plantar pressures in athletes with cavus feet.

Clinical Relevance: Regional differences in pressure reduction suggest neutral-cushioned running shoe recommendation should shift from being categorical in nature to being based on location of injury or elevated plantar pressure.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.