AJSM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on May 23, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546508317413

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:2002.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/10/2002    most recent
0363546508317413v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrow, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cooperman, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farrow, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cooperman, D. R.

Article

Radiographic Location of the Lateral Intercondylar Ridge: Its Relationship to Blumensaat’s Line

Lutul D. Farrow, MD1*, Robert J. Gillespie, MD2, Brian N. Victoroff, MD2, Daniel R. Cooperman, MD2

1 Cleveland Clinic Sports Health
2 University Hospitals Case Medical Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lutulfarrowmd{at}yahoo.com.


   Abstract

Background: The lateral intercondylar ridge (resident’s ridge) is considered to be an important landmark during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Presently, no study exists describing the location of this vital landmark on plain radiographic images.

Hypothesis: Lateral intercondylar ridge location can be estimated on lateral plain film images.

Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods: Lateral radiographic images were taken of 20 distal femora with metallic markers overlying the lateral intercondylar ridge. The length of Blumensaat’s line and the distance from the anterior extent of Blumensaat’s line to the point where the lateral intercondylar ridge intersects Blumensaat’s line were measured. The ratio of these measurements was then determined (Blumensaat’s-ridge ratio). The angle of the lateral intercondylar ridge with respect to Blumensaat’s line (Blumensaat’s-ridge angle) was also determined.

Results: The mean length of Blumensaat’s line was 32.1 mm (95% confidence interval, 31.0-33.2 mm). The mean distance from the anterior extent of Blumensaat’s line to the point where the lateral intercondylar ridge intersects Blumensaat’s line was 25.3 mm (95% confidence interval, 24.3-26.3 mm). The mean Blumensaat’s-ridge ratio was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.81). The mean Blumensaat’s-ridge angle was 75.5° (95% confidence interval, 72.0°-79.1°).

Conclusion: The lateral intercondylar ridge intersects Blumensaat’s line at a point defined by multiplying the Blumensaat’s line length by 0.79. From this point, the ridge runs at a 75.5° angle with respect to Blumensaat’s line.

Clinical Relevance: Awareness of the radiographic location of the lateral intercondylar ridge may help confirm accurate tunnel placement when arthroscopic positioning is in doubt. Furthermore, femoral tunnel position can be quickly and accurately assessed in the outpatient setting in patients with unsatisfactory outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.